- MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG SOFTWARE
- MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG ISO
- MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG FREE
MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG ISO
This is said to be unprecedented for standards bodies, which usually act together and have generally worked to resolve concerns amicably.Ĩ7 ISO member countries responded to the five-month ballot. There have been reports of attempted vote buying, heated verbal confrontations, refusal to come to consensus and other very unusual behavior in national standards bodies.
MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG SOFTWARE
On the supporting side were primarily Microsoft affiliated companies on the opposing side were free- or open-source software organizations, IBM and affiliates, Sun Microsystems, and Google. Various factions have strongly supported and opposed this fast track process. This has been observed to be perhaps the most controversial and unusual ISO ballot ever convened, both in the number of comments in opposition, and in unusual actions during the voting process. After a comment period, the ISO held a ballot that closed September 2007. In the ballot resolution phase the submitted comments were addressed and members were invited to reconsider their vote.ĭuring the standardization of Office Open XML, Ecma International submitted its Office Open XML File Formats standard (ECMA-376) to the ISO Fast Track process. During the ballot phase the members voted on the specification as it was submitted by Ecma and submitted editorial and technical comments with their vote. The fast track process consists of a contradictions phase, a ballot phase, and a ballot resolution phase.ĭuring the contradictions phase, ISO and IEC members submitted perceived contradictions to JTC 1. ISO and IEC classified the specification as DIS 29500 (Draft International Standard 29500) Information technology – Office Open XML file formats. They submitted the documents "Explanatory report on Office Open XML Standard (Ecma-376) submitted to JTC 1 for fast-track" and "Licensing conditions that Microsoft offers for Office Open XML". To meet the requirements of this process, Using their entitlement as an ISO/IEC JTC 1 external Category A liaison, Ecma International submitted ECMA-376 to the JTC 1 fast track standardization process.
MICROSOFT OFFICE VS OPENOFFICE ORG FREE
The standard can be downloaded from Ecma free of charge. It was approved as an Ecma standard (ECMA-376) on December 7, 2006. ĭuring standardisation within Ecma the specification grew to approximately 6,000 pages. The technical committee was chaired by two Microsoft employees and included members drawn from Apple, Canon, Intel, NextPage, Novell, Pioneer, Statoil ASA, Toshiba, The United States Library of Congress, The British Library and the Gnome Foundation. Ecma formed a technical committee (TC45) in December 2005, in order to produce and maintain a "formal standard for office productivity applications that is fully compatible with the Office Open XML Formats, submitted by Microsoft". More than a year after being asked by the European Union to standardize their Office 2003 XML formats, Microsoft submitted 2,000 pages of documentation for a new file format to the Ecma International consortium for it to be made into an open standard. Standardization within Ecma International 4 Arguments in support and criticism of Office Open XML standard.3.5 Microsoft complaints about competitors.3.4 Investigation of Microsoft by the European Commission.3.1 Complaints about the national bodies process.1 Standardization within Ecma International.
0 kommentar(er)
